X

Elon Musk names Saudi wealth fund as Tesla's funding source

Talks to take the automaker private again are still ongoing, so there's still plenty of time before anything is set in stone.

Tesla

Last week saw quite the storm of activity when Elon Musk announced that he wanted to take private again and had "secured" the multibillion-dollar funding for it. Now, he's written another blog post to clarify the situation, though it's at odds with a separate report from this past weekend.

Musk on Monday posted on Tesla's website to explain what's been happening behind the scenes as Tesla potentially prepares to go private. The timeline begins on Aug. 2, when Musk told the board that he wanted to take Tesla private. The board held a meeting (without Musk or his brother Kimbal, who is also a board member), and Musk said he would reach out to some of Tesla's biggest investors to further discuss the issue.

That blog post appears to name Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund, the country's investment vehicle, as being responsible for the funding that Musk said was "secured" in his tweet. According to the blog post, the fund first met with Musk in early 2017 to discuss going private again, and the two parties met multiple times thereafter. The most recent meeting took place on July 31, after the Saudi fund had accumulated a minority stake of about 5 percent.

Tesla Roadster
Enlarge Image
Tesla Roadster

If it went private, Tesla wouldn't need to worry about catering to its quarterly reports, which could free it up to move faster in other places, like new-car development.

Tesla

What's interesting about this situation is that Reuters has some sources alleging the opposite. On Saturday, Reuters reported that, according to its sources, Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF) had "no interest" in financing Tesla's return to private ownership. When asked for comment, a Tesla spokesperson said to refer to Musk's blog post. However, another, more recent report from Bloomberg claims that the PIF is, in fact, talking about funding the buyout.

It wouldn't be wise for Musk to lie about something like this right now. Last week, it was reported that the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was looking into Tesla following Musk's tweets about taking the company private. If the funding wasn't actually secured when Musk said it was, he could end up in hot water with the feds. Thus, it would be a strange time to double down on these assertions if they weren't true.

Late Monday, fueled the discussion further by tweeting that he was "excited" that Silver Lake and Goldman Sachs were working as financial advisors to take the company private.

We're still a ways away from any of this coming to fruition, though. Per Musk's blog post, the board still needs to put together a plan that it can agree upon, at which point it will be offered up to a shareholder vote. Only once the shareholders approve the plan can it proceed. Until that happens, Musk said he'll keep talking to investors and advisors about the best way to go forward.

Taking Tesla private could provide some serious peace of mind to Musk. He's already laid out his reasons for going down this road. The company wouldn't need to place a heavy focus on short-term quarterly reports, so it could shift priorities toward long-term strategies that might not carry any immediate payoff. It would also stop the "shorts" from attempting to profit off a potential fall in Tesla's share price. Musk has railed against these investors on Twitter for some time, going so far as to assert that Tesla is the most shorted company in the history of the stock market.

This is the new Tesla Roadster

See all photos

Originally published at 6:52 a.m. PT.
Updated at 6:35 p.m. PT with Musk tweet about financial advisors.

Andrew Krok Reviews Editor / Cars
Cars are Andrew's jam, as is strawberry. After spending years as a regular ol' car fanatic, he started working his way through the echelons of the automotive industry, starting out as social-media director of a small European-focused garage outside of Chicago. From there, he moved to the editorial side, penning several written features in Total 911 Magazine before becoming a full-time auto writer, first for a local Chicago outlet and then for CNET Cars.
Andrew Krok
Cars are Andrew's jam, as is strawberry. After spending years as a regular ol' car fanatic, he started working his way through the echelons of the automotive industry, starting out as social-media director of a small European-focused garage outside of Chicago. From there, he moved to the editorial side, penning several written features in Total 911 Magazine before becoming a full-time auto writer, first for a local Chicago outlet and then for CNET Cars.

Article updated on August 13, 2018 at 6:35 PM PDT

Our Experts

Written by 
Andrew Krok
CNET staff -- not advertisers, partners or business interests -- determine how we review the products and services we cover. If you buy through our links, we may get paid. Reviews ethics statement
Andrew Krok Reviews Editor / Cars
Cars are Andrew's jam, as is strawberry. After spending years as a regular ol' car fanatic, he started working his way through the echelons of the automotive industry, starting out as social-media director of a small European-focused garage outside of Chicago. From there, he moved to the editorial side, penning several written features in Total 911 Magazine before becoming a full-time auto writer, first for a local Chicago outlet and then for CNET Cars.
Why You Can Trust CNET
174175176177178179180+
Experts Interviewed
030405060708091011121314+
Companies Reviewed
108109110111112113+
Products Reviewed

We thoroughly evaluate each company and product we review and ensure our stories meet our high editorial standards.